South Korean prosecutors indict president on martial law charges

May Be Interested In:‘We are the underdogs’: Bruised and bloodied Panthers dealt GF rematch blow


South Korean prosecutors have indicted impeached president Yoon Suk Yeol over his short-lived martial law decree, making him the country’s first leader to face criminal charges while in office.

Yoon is accused of leading an insurrection after he declared martial law on December 3 and sent troops into the national parliament. He withdrew the order six hours later after opposition MPs voted to reject it.

Impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol attends a hearing in his impeachment trial at the Constitutional Court on January 21 in Seoul.Credit: Getty Images

The move shocked the country and plunged it into its worst political crisis in decades. It marked the first time South Korea had come under military rule since its transition to democracy in the late 1980s.

His indictment sets in train a trial process and, if convicted, he faces the prospect of life imprisonment or even the death penalty, although South Korea has not executed anyone in decades.

Yoon has been detained since January 15 when hundreds of police swarmed the presidential residence where he had been holed for weeks while refusing authorities’ requests to face questioning over the incident.

Loading

With the arrest warrant due to expire, prosecutors faced the option of formally indicting him or releasing him after a court twice refused requests to extend his detention over the weekend. A number of top military officials have also been indicted for their roles in the alleged insurrection.

The saga has exposed deep divisions within Korean society. Thousands of anti-Yoon protesters took to the streets to rally for the president to be removed from office, while Yoon’s conservative base also turned out in their thousands to defend the embattled leader.

Yoon, a former prosecutor himself, and his legal team have maintained his arrest was illegal and have argued that the use of martial law by a president cannot constitute treason. However, many experts have argued that his decree was unconstitutional.

share Share facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

NRL 2025: Canberra Raiders star Hudson Young reflects on wild week in Las Vegas.
NRL 2025: Canberra Raiders star Hudson Young reflects on wild week in Las Vegas.
Trump nominates banker Warren Stephens as UK ambassador
Trump nominates banker Warren Stephens as UK ambassador
LA fires live updates: Palisades, Eaton and Hurst fires still uncontained; multiple people dead and thousands of homes destroyed
LA fires live updates: Palisades, Eaton and Hurst fires still uncontained; multiple people dead and thousands of homes destroyed
Antisemitic vandalism on Military Road in Dover Heights
Antisemitic vandalism on Military Road in Dover Heights
Lynda Carter returns to Wonder Woman roots for bold new photoshoot and looks age-defying
Lynda Carter returns to Wonder Woman roots for bold new photoshoot and looks age-defying
Best of cartoons, February 12, 2025
Best of cartoons, February 12, 2025
Hot Off the Press: Breaking Stories You Need to Hear | © 2025 | Daily News