Minns says antisemitism doesn’t start with a firebombing. Will his new laws find where it does?

May Be Interested In:No casinos, no kids: This ship could convert cruise sceptics



Section 93z has long been a source of contention, and many religious and legal groups are divided on what to do with it.

Loading

Last year the Minns government asked the NSW Law Reform Commission to review it after reports of antisemitic sermons in some Sydney mosques. The Australian National Imams Council President Imam Shadi Alsuleiman at the time accused Minns of “specifically targeting” the Muslim community with the review.

In the end, though, the Law Reform Commission recommended against any changes to the law.

While the Jewish Board of Deputies argued in favour of the changes Minns seems to be contemplating, as well as expanding the section to include words such as “urges”, “promotes”, “advocates” or “glorifies” alongside “incites”, others disagreed.

The Anglican and Catholic dioceses of Sydney and the National Imams Council opposed making incitement of hatred a criminal offence, as did the NSW Law Society and Aboriginal Legal Service.

In its report, the commission pointed out words such as “hatred” are imprecise, and can mean different things to different people. It warned changing the law could have a perverse outcome, making hate speech harder to prove because criminal courts have a higher burden of proof.

But there is another element to this: if hatred against Sydney’s Jewish population doesn’t begin, as Minns put it, on a street corner in Sydney’s east, where does it?

Minns has remained vague on the source. In the same interview on the ABC, the premier declined to identify where the “hateful rhetoric” was coming from.

Pressed by Ben Fordham on 2GB on Tuesday morning, he said only that it was “taking place in our community” and “in different parts of society”.

Of course, Minns can hardly go on the radio and accuse specific people of spreading racial hate, but his reluctance to identify causes points to a more significant problem.

Hatred, whether on religious, racial or gender grounds, is not unipolar, and it is clear from the identities of some of those alleged by police to have carried out attacks in Sydney’s east, that this is not just a case of sectarian violence being imported from the Middle East.

A state premier can’t solve thousands of years of tangled religious and racial animosity, the vast and confused web of the conspiratorial internet, or the terrible, haunting human carnage wrought by Israel in Gaza and Lebanon that preceded the chilling acts of violence against Sydney’s Jewish community.

Minns’ determination to tackle antisemitism at its root causes is commendable. But a government cannot legislate away prejudice, and a bigotry as complex and confused as this will not be resolved by reforming 93z.

The premier, in some ways, is coming up against the limits of his influence.

share Share facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

Monfils creates history in Auckland
Monfils creates history in Auckland
Russian agent 'wanted successful UK operation after Skripal'
Russian agent ‘wanted successful UK operation after Skripal’
Anger after infected blood compensation put on hold
Anger after infected blood compensation put on hold
Player ratings: Top-order batters, spinners lead Australia’s rout of Sri Lanka
Player ratings: Top-order batters, spinners lead Australia’s rout of Sri Lanka
Fear stalks the land of Franz, but music’s Mr Chaos is fine with it
Fear stalks the land of Franz, but music’s Mr Chaos is fine with it
Newspaper headlines: 'Shocking Labour hypocrisy' and Wallace whistleblower
Newspaper headlines: ‘Shocking Labour hypocrisy’ and Wallace whistleblower
Hot Off the Press: Breaking Stories You Need to Hear | © 2025 | Daily News