Creative Australia terminates artist – and admits it might not find a replacement

“What happened at that moment was a recognition by me and the board that this entire process was going to be mired in the worst kind of divisive debate – the potential of this to damage the artist himself but the organisation that we are here to serve,” Collette said.

The agency had not done a search of the artist’s back catalogue before their appointment, Collette said: “We don’t do that. We judge the work in front of us and the potential to fulfil the brief that we are looking for.”

The statements are the first to be made by Collette, who appeared at the estimates session alongside board chairman Robert Morgan.

Under sustained questioning from Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young, both leaders said they saw no need to resign. Asked if he should apologise to the sacked artistic team, Collette said: “I want to talk to Michael and Khaled first.”

He said the decision had been “the toughest one in my quite long experience in the artistic sector”, and that Creative Australia strived always to have the artist’s back.

Loading

Morgan said the board had been shocked by the artwork and caught between “a rock and a hard place”.

But Hanson-Young said the actions of the board had opened the door for the agency to be consumed by the same kind of polarising political rancour experienced by the ABC.

In the fallout, Creative Australia announced on Monday it had postponed the 2025 Asia Pacific Arts Awards which  were to have been announced on March 3 at a ceremony at Arts Centre Melbourne.

The arts agency cited regard for the “wellbeing of all involved” as the reason for delaying the awards.

“While we regret any inconvenience this may cause, this decision has been made to support the wellbeing of all involved, as we feel it is important to take a pause during this time,” it wrote to the 30 finalists.

Fourteen Australian curators who have managed works in Venice also penned an open letter on Tuesday calling for the pair’s reinstatement.

“We are stunned that in these fraught times, the Creative Australia Board and CEO took no time to defend their decision against uninformed comments on Sabsabi’s early works by those who had not even seen them,” they said.

“Rather than fostering civil discussion of complex subjects, their reactive move has inflamed a polarised debate.”